The first stage is Vintage: you might be lucky enough to get parts for this Mac, the second is Obsolete: you are out on your own when it comes to any attempt to mend the Mac if it goes wrong. Apple has two standards that indicate hardware support is waining: Obsolete or Vintage.
It’s also a question of whether it will be possible to fix your Mac should something go wrong with the hardware.
IDEFRAG DESTROYED MY MAC SOFTWARE
When do Macs become obsolete?īut it’s not just software updates that determine the lifespan of a Mac.
IDEFRAG DESTROYED MY MAC UPDATE
If you want to run fully supported software then you will need to update to a newer version of macOS – and that may mean that you need to update your Mac.Īpple supports Macs with operating system updates for approximately eight to ten years, after which time Apple will not support the software and it’s probably a good time to replace your Mac. If you are experiencing random shutdowns, for example, it could be due to problems with an app you are running – problems that will not be addressed by the developer because that version of the app is no longer supported. Apple and other companies stop supporting older versions of the applications they make, so there could be issues with the versions of the software you are running. You may also find that the software you need won’t run on your Mac. Unexpected shutdowns are becoming commonplace and you’ve tried everything to fix the problem to no avail. Something breaks and is too expensive to fix or the parts aren’t available.The Mac struggles to perform the tasks you need it to – especially if you can’t update the RAM or any other components.The apps you need to use no longer run on it.Apple no longer supports the latest version of the software it runs (which could leave you vulnerable).There are a few indicators that your Mac has reached the end of its useful life: Being Vintage means Apple may have the parts available if you wanted to fix the Mac, but once Obsolete Apple will not provide parts if you wanted to try and fix the machine. Last edit at 11:20AM by chas_m.In this article we will address the above, as well as give advice about which Macs are still supported by Apple, the Macs that can still be repaired if required (Apple stops providing the required parts after a number of years), and the Macs that Apple considers obsolete and vintage. <- Moving to Canada blogĮdited 2 time(s). If you have nothing better to do with your time, however, the method described by tuqqer's friend IS superior to iDefrag's method of "live" defragging, particularly if you already use SuperDuper (or Carbon Copy Cloner) to keep a bootable clone of your system as a backup. You will pick up some speed increase VERY temporarily, but the way OS X works means it will start "fragging" your drive again almost immediately. [ Ultimately, defragging an OS X drive using something like iDefrag is pointless. They claim a benefit for people who work with large files or continuously need large swapfiles (ie low RAM): The makers of iDefrag are aware of this, and actually work with (and in some cases, around OS X's defrag routine. I wonder why?Īpple lays out their case here (it's not like this was a secret or anything): Can anyone here name the leading commercial defragger for UNIX? No? Oh wait, there isn't one. Some nice speed increases, mainly in startup time, a few apps like Word, ID CS2, Photoshop. Long story short, I purchased it, and ran it on my main drive Friday night. I then read way too many articles and reviews on it and defragmentation in general with OSX. What Apple DOES claim is that OS X does not REQUIRE defragmentation. As I mentioned earlier, a friend pointed out a defrag app called iDefrag. It also makes use of a clustered "hot zone," keeping the files you use most often (that meet the afore-mentioned condition) defragged. It *does,* however, automatically defrag files under a certain size (I think it's 20MB or so) on the fly when you open or use them.
anyone can comment on this please?Ĭloning writes the files in a non-fragmented order, so yes in effect it does defrag.Ĭontrary to myth, Apple makes NO CLAIM that OS X defrags your drive. it keeps the file structure as it is, including the fragmented files. I thought that cloning a drive is just, cloning, i.e. While there are risks involved in any method, I consider this to be far less risky than using a defrag utility. This almost always takes significantly less time than using a utility, especially for a badly fragmented drive and it leaves you with a fresh backup. The drive is written back with the files in order – in other words, no more fraggies. Clone the image back to your original drive (Super Duper). Use a program like Super Duper to clone your drive to another drive – I usually just make a disk image on the other drive so I don’t have to wipe it.Ĥ. Fix disk permissions and verify disk (Disk Utility) and clean the directory (DiskWarrior) on the drive to be defragged.ģ. Take this as a good reason to update a DVD (archive quality) backup of the most important stuff.Ģ. It takes a fraction of the time, creates a backup in the process, and puts less wear on the drive. Quote I think the best way to defrag is to use the copy method.
0 kommentar(er)
